Writing the Thieves Guild

One of the questions I get every so often is “How can you produce not just one, but three audio dramas on a weekly schedule?” The short answer is that I’m cheating, but I don’t want to be glib, so I figured I’d provide a bit more detail.

I say I cheat because two of the current audio dramas–Artifacts of the Arcane & Thursday–are being fairly strictly adapted from already existing novels. They aren’t cut and paste adaptations, but it’s close. All I have to do is remove dialogue tags and adapt to small things that are really only applicable to prose. That doesn’t take much time, so there’s not much writing involved.

That’s not the case for The Thieves Guild. I finished adapting my existing work from the first two novels over four months ago. Ever since then I’ve been writing each episode every week. It’s a pretty strict schedule. I didn’t skip a week when my daughter got married in November, and I didn’t skip a week for Christmas or New Year’s. So, in a lot of ways, it’s just embracing the habit of writing.

The habit looks like this: On Tuesday or Wednesday I go over the past four to six episodes and which characters were the focused points-of-view. Generally speaking, I’ll choose the character who has had the longest wait for an update to their story and write about them. I don’t always do this. For example, this week I added a new point-of-view character. Also, sometimes I combine two characters in a single episode. I also did that this week. But, generally speaking, I’ll see which character is owed a story, and I write about them.

The next part of the process is pretty simple and one that terrifies some writers: With a Thursday deadline, I spend time on Tuesday and Wednesday thinking over what the episode will cover. That’s right: There is no outline for the Thieves Guild, and there is no specific medium-term plotting. In writing terms, we call this “pantsing,” as in “writing from the seat of your pants.”

To dig into that a little bit more: I do have some broad ideas on where I want to go, but that is informed by the on-the-spot decisions I’ve made over time. For example, right now I know what is going to happen with the politics of Ness. I know which characters are going to fall into which role. But I have no idea what is going to happen with the other cities, and I don’t know what role that Ralan will play long-term once things settle down in Ness.

And that leads me into the actual writing: I write the full episode, which is usually 1,500 to 2,000 words, on Wednesday night and Thursday morning. It is not difficult because, as I noted, I have an idea of where the scene will go but not what is happening in the scene. So the writing is actually quite fun. It’s like I’m actually reading a story that I’m interested in.

Once the story is written, it goes off to production, and I put the story aside, not thinking of it again until the next week.

A few things make this work for me:

The first is that I spent many years writing a 2,000 word column with a weekly deadline. So the idea of filling that much text in a week is something I have plenty of experience and comfort in.

The second is that I write fairly fast and fairly precise. I usually have an episode written in two or three hours. After that there is not much editing that needs to be done. Sometimes (oddly enough, like this week’s episode), I’ll be producing the audio and I’ll have a brainstorm about how the scene could go better. I’ll then rewrite it on the fly while in production. This is not unlike how some productions go in Hollywood, actually.

Finally, I’m one of those writers that can context switch easily. I can move from “domestic chore brain” or “work brain” to “writing brain” fairly easily.

A question I get rarely but I still get asked is how I’m able to create such a complex narrative, with different people plotting with different goals and with minor things from episode 2 suddenly showing up in episode 60. The answer is a bit of a cop out: It just seems to work. I can’t really explain it. Much of it is serendipity. For example, there is a major bombshell coming in the story. I’m hinting at it now, as the idea hit me a couple episodes ago, and when the bombshell drops everyone will say, “That makes so much sense! All the hints were there from the beginning! What an exquisite job Jake did plotting this!”

Not really. What I saw were a bunch of disconnected things that worked in the moment that I was able to stitch together into this cohesive story component that somehow works perfectly with all the things going on around it. There are examples throughout the series. Pietro’s books are the best example. They were a small setting detail to add ambience to Pietro’s basement quarters, but many episodes later they became much more. Rogers’ defense of the Pit was meant to just create some action, but it will turn out to be a major part of his story. And Rogers himself is a great example: He was a bit character that I didn’t intend to focus on for more than a short section of the series, but now he’s a major character.

And I think that kind of explains the whole process for me: I write the series like the listeners experience it. I discover new things. I let the story take me where it will. And I really enjoy finding little surprises.

Learning Writing From Reading “Bad” Books

Recently a young writer posted on Reddit about the advice from Stephen King to augment your writing journey by learning what not to do via reading bad books. Alan Moore also mentions this in his Masterclass videos. While I don’t disagree with this advice, I think it is, perhaps paradoxically, one of the more challenging bits of writing homework one can give.

The Reddit thread gives a great example. A user posted about how their entire literature class hated the Gertrude Stein writing assignment and the resulting class was cancelled due to this. The poster’s implication within the context of the post was that Gertrude Stein was clearly a bad writer you could learn from.

I don’t disagree with this but probably not for the reasons the commenter intended. Stein is a great example of why the guidance to read bad books is really challenging to do right. People’s tastes are so broad and the world of literature is so complex that what you might consider “bad” might actually be just something presented in a different way or with a different cultural context or for a different audience.

When the 1Pulitzer jury selected “No Award” about ten years ago, one of the judges outlined a section of David Foster Wallace prose as clearly indicative of the novel being worthy of the award. I read it and thought it was a purple prose self-indulgent slog. Of course, that was just my opinion and wasn’t really relevant. There are countless people who felt it was poetic, and the flowing river of description being a languid and wonderful immersion in the scene.

So neither of us were actually right. It wasn’t bad. It wasn’t good. It was bad for some people and good for some people. And that is why writing is so challenging.

Henry James wrote a wonderful story called 2“The Figure in the Carpet,” which among other things is a metaphor for the writer’s pursuit of the perfect reader. In the story, there is a secret to the writer’s novel that it turns out only one person has discovered. It was, in short, a work of such genius that only one person could appreciate it. But is a work that the entire world can’t understand and only one person can unlock the highest form of art? Or is it the worst of novels?

So while I don’t dismiss the concept of “bad novels,” and I don’t dismiss the idea of “learning from bad novels,” I do think that the exercise should be approached with caution and serious attention.

1 https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/letter-from-the-pulitzer-fiction-jury-what-really-happened-this-year

2 https://gutenberg.org/ebooks/645

Cover Reveal!

I’ll write more about exciting publishing news in the near future, but let me start with the first news… the release of a newly revised and brand new edition of my swashbuckling fantasy series The Thieves Guild. I wrote this as a personal project and a labor of love, inspired by my favorite storytellers. Basically I wanted to write a serial type series that had chapter level cliffhangers like Charles Dickens, a totally swashbuckling almost non-stop tension novel like Robert E. Howard, and engaging characters like Edgar Rice Burroughs.

Thieves Guild ebook cover

To the left is the beautiful cover, courtesy my creative brothers and sisters at In Shambles Productions’ design department. It truly captures the heart of the book—a young man thrust into the black-cloaked Thieves Guild, not sure what he got himself into and where he’s going to go.

This is book one, and book two—The Burning City—will be released on December 1. Book three will be released in mid-2024. This will be an ongoing series, and I feel like it may never end, even as the characters change, and the world expands. That said—each novel is a stand-alone story, so readers won’t be left wondering what happened with the current tale.

The Thieves Guild will be available for pre-order on August 18, with a September 1 release date. It will be available in paperback and ebook from Broadsword Books on that date, with an audiobook release later in September.

No Critique This Month

Unfortunately, I won’t be doing a free critique this month due to some exciting stuff that I’ll be announcing in a week or two. I’m going to make up for it by doing two next month. Sorry all!

I’ll be an instructor at this years Cascade Writers Workshop

I’m incredibly thrilled to announce that I’ll be an instructor at this year’s Cascade Writers Workshop in Bremerton, Washington. I was a participant last year, so this is especially exciting for me.

A number of my friends will be attending and instructing, so I’m really looking forward to it. Now I just need to decide on what I’ll be teaching….

I’d love to see you. If you’d like to take part, you can find details here.

Moving From Scrivener to Word

I’m sometimes asked if writing screenplays has helped my novel or prose writing, and the answer is it has. It has improved my dialogue, but even more than that it has improved my ability to structure the narrative of a novel. As a result, I do a lot more moving of chapters in the writing process these days.

This creates an interesting challenge when you are taking a work where you move the chapters around and need to package it for a submission to an agent or publisher. In a lot of writing platforms, dynamically updating chapter numbers after these changes can’t be done.

The good news is that Scrivener allows you do to that, but I absolutely hate the Scrivener user experience and export functionality. Without fail, the document I export will have some issue with it or other. It’s not that Scrivener is bad software, it’s that it requires detailed understanding of the tool to make it work right, and I simply didn’t have the patience to figure all that out.

I tried Ulysses, which allows you to move chapters around easily via drag and drop, but Ulysses doesn’t provide any easy way to dynamically re-number chapters, making it unhelpful when putting together a submittable document.

Which brought me full circle to Microsoft Word. I never really saw Word as anything more than a word processor but in my frustration at the other options I looked at it more closely, and what do you know—there is an easy way to add chapter headings with one click. There’s an easy way to drag chapters and move them. And—amazingly—the chapter numbers dynamically update. I also have fallen in love with the Word styles palette.

It’s probably worth noting that I took a look at LibreOffice Writer, as well, and I was extremely impressed. That said, it didn’t have the all-in-one simplicity of Word.

So, after abandoning Word years ago, I am back and—in truth—loving it.

Wedding Day Revisions Are Complete

The road from short story to novel has been long and winding for Wedding Day, but we have reached our destination. After wonderful feedback from beta readers, the final revisions are done. Now to send it out to agents and perhaps a publisher or two. We shall see.

Next up for me is to go back and re-start the Thursday feature screenplay. That will be a lot of fun, and my goal is to have it done quickly as a lot of the work has already been completed.

March Critique Giveaway is Over

Congrates to John, who won our March giveaway of notes and a critique. Next months’ giveaway will open in about ten days.

For those who entered this month, your free ebooks will be delivered within the next few days.

Hold The Phone! Change of Plans!

I just received beta reader feedback on my Wedding Day novel, so my new immediate plan is to revise Wedding Day and then go back and work on the Thursday feature. This is a pretty significant degree of context switching, and I do prefer to work on one project at a time, but as I haven’t started directly on Thursday yet, this won’t be too difficult.

Introducing Jake’s Critique Lab

Inspired by Nathan Graham Davis, who gives back to the screenwriting community by providing notes on one screenplay a month, I’ve decided to do the same thing to give back to the writing community that has helped me so much.

You can find all the details by clicking on the Jake’s Critique Lab menu above or clicking here.